Tuesday 20 March 2012

Descending to the Cellular Level of Atopic Dermatitis (AD)



Journal Article

Mathay, C., Pierre, M., Pittelkow, M., Depiereux, E., Nikkels, A., Colige, A., et al. (2010). Transcriptional profiling after lipid raft disruption in keratinocytes identifies critical mediators of atopic dermatitis pathways. [Journal Article]. The Journal Of Investigative Dermatology, 131(1), pp. 46-58.


This primary research article goes down to the cellular level in studying atopic eczema. Here’s a quick introduction of the basic structure of the skin before we delve into the research.

The skin is made up of three layers: the epidermis, dermis and subcutaneous tissue.



The area we are interested in today is the topmost layer called the epidermis. Keratinocytes are the predominant skin cells here. They undergo differentiation to form different kinds of cells in the epidermal layer. New skin cells are forming at the bottom layer and move toward the top while the older cells on top die and rise to the skin’s surface. They then flake off.

Epidermis


In this study conducted by scientists from various Belgium universities and USA laboratories, further research into the function of membrane lipid rafts was conducted, with interesting findings related to atopic dermatitis.

Methods

Quoting verbatim from the article: “whole-genome transcriptional profiling in MBCD-treated keratinocytes was performed”. In English, this means that the scientists messed up the fat in the membranes of this skin cells, than examined them closely.

They measured transcript levels in the cells immediately after cholesterol depletion, 1 hour later and 8 hours later.

What does transcript levels refer to? Transcription is the process of creating a complementary RNA copy of a sequence of DNA. Keratinocytes respond to cholesterol depletion by inducing the transcription of genes that help in making cholesterol.

Cholesterol biosynthesis is a major occurrence after fat is taken out and scientists use this method of studying keratinocytes because combined with bioinformatics data analyses, they can identify and characterize lipid raft-dependent transcriptional targets and cell signaling pathways. Armed with such information, they proceed to do an association of functions and diseases with lipid raft-disrupted keratinocytes.

Results

The study documented various cell responses at different points in time, going into detail with the different types of genes. The results are pretty complex as over 3, 000 genes were differentially regulated, with some like metalloproteinases being highly upregulated and other genes downregulated.



Diagram showing Differential regulations at Time periods


What was most significant for our interest in eczema is that AD associates the most significantly with the transcriptional profile observed at R0h, and AD is second at R1h after lipid raft disruption by MBCD. This means eczema sufferers are found to have this kind of fat-disrupted cell membrane skin cells occurring at time=0h and 1h. This shows that in skin cells of people with eczema, there may be a problem in lipid raft organization and signaling.

Illustration of potential networks showing relevant genes and their possible interactions, either immediately after cholesterol depletion (at 0 hours (R0h (a))


In the second part of the study they compared AD skin with normal skin by collecting skin biopsy specimens of acute lesions and surrounding normal-appearing skin of AD patients (average age: 39 years), as well as biopsy specimens of healthy volunteers (average age: 43 years) after informed consent. The transcript levels of several major targets of cholesterol depletion were analyzed.

Skin Biopsy.  http://www.beliefnet.com/healthandhealing/getcontent.aspx?cid=14861




Regarding the results of this part of the study, the article says that: “In summary, when comparing AD skin with normal skin, increased expression levels of IVL, TGM1, HB-EGF, IL-8, and PLAUR are detected simultaneously with a decreased expression of FLG and LOR.”

How clever! We will take their word for it. These results agree with their results in the first part of the transcriptional analysis of gene expression in lipid raft-disrupted keratinocytes, strongly suggesting that membrane organization and signaling might be disturbed in AD keratinocytes.

Normal skin VS Eczematous Skin
 http://www.yalescientific.org/2011/05/the-mechanisms-and-perception-of-itch/


Understanding more about genes connected to atopic dermatitis may not have a direct impact on the day-to-day skin care program of eczema sufferers, but it portends future developments in possibly gene therapy and personalized medicine. Perhaps in the future scientists may invent a medicine that can enhance residual enzyme activity in the membrane of keratinocytes that lead to AD.

The current treatment of eczema is concerned with managing the symptoms and this research offers the tantalizing prospect of targeting the root of the problem. But we are like people in Plato’s cave who cannot ‘see’ and our evaluation of the importance of this study can at best be speculative. Its worth would eventually be revealed with the passing of time and progress of medicine. 


Wednesday 7 March 2012

Are steroids safe to use?


The controversy I have chosen to discuss centres around the use of corticosteroids to treat atopic eczema.




Mild cortisone (or steroid) cream or ointment are often prescribed to control the symptoms of atopic eczema by reducing the inflammation and promoting healing.

In 1952, Sulzberger and Witten70 published a report which promoted the use of a new topical drug in dermatology,5 17 hydroxycortisonee 21 acetate. Improvement was judged after 1 week based on clinical criteria, namely decreased pruritus, diminished erythema, and reduced scaling. Since its first use in dermatology, TCS therapy has been developed so success-fully that dermatology cannot be envisaged without TCS. (1) 

Therefore, steriods have proven to be effective in most cases and most doctors would recommend a mild steroid together with moisturizers as a standard treatment for eczema sufferers.

However, concern over the side effects has caused some people reject the use of cortisone for eczema entirely. Side effects associated with corticocosterioid use include skin atrophy, meaning that the skin is thinned out and more vulnerable. When large amounts are applied and absorbed into the body, it may cause hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression, where the functioning of the endocrine system is affected. Steroids may also cause glaucoma if they enter the eye.



I personally feel that these fears are exaggerated and with proper use, steroids can aid in the treatment of eczema without those nasty side effects.

This is the recommended treatment found in an academic journal about management of eczema:

• topical steroids -- helpful in inflammatory atopic eczema. Potent steroid preparations should be used only to get the eczema under control, and should not be used on the face. They can safely be followed by a mild steroid. Steroids under wet tube gauze (wet wrap) will sometimes be effective, and prevent scratching. (2)

This video here from the National Eczema Association talks about the use of topical medications from 6:10. It says that "When used correctly, these medications are safe and effective."




Topical steroids can be used but patients should take heed of those warnings and use it in a thin layer over affected areas only. The first line of defense would still be to moisturize.



References

1. G, T., D, W., & A, T. (2007). Topical therapy of atopic dermatitis: controversies from Hippocrates to topical immunomodulators. Journal Of The American Academy Of Dermatology, 56(2), pp. 295-301.

2. Watkins, J. (2009). Eczema: types, presentation, causes and management. Practice Nurse, 38(4), p11-18.

Wednesday 22 February 2012

2. Not all that glitters is gold- Avoiding untrustworthy information sources

I had some fun looking for quack websites but after a while this sense of jest was replaced by one of concern. Sufferers may be so desperate for help that they may choose to throw caution to the wind and believe such information sources. And such marketers and business people are really just exploiting people's illness to make a quick buck. 


It's important to have the right information, not just a lot of it, to make good treatment decisions. I have here today an example of a bad website. I hope you can learn the skills of identifying bad websites and avoid them.


Here's the one I found:  
http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/

#1 Misinformation


This is a piece of misinformation and lacks credibility as it just villainizes pasteurized milk by labeling it as damaged and does not actually explain how pasteurized milk might contribute to these dysfunctions. It plays on the reader’s fear of harming her child to persuade her to buy raw milk.

This websites ostensibly cites physicians, but it has chosen to quote Dr Joseph Mercola, a controversial alternative medicine advocate who has been warned by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration three times before to stop making illegal claims regarding his products' ability to detect, prevent and treat disease.

I wanted to investigate the premise of the raw milk claim and went to mayoclinic.com. There a found a blog, which may not seem too reliable, but it was written by two nutritionists and presented a well-balanced argument.

The information entirely refuted the raw milk suggestion given in the quack Shirley’s website.
‘Fans of raw milk assert that it tastes sweeter and fresher. They also claim that it fights allergies, digestive problems, eczema, autism, arthritis and learning disabilities, and boosts immunity — properties that they say are removed by pasteurization. The FDA and other public health officials, however, point out that these claims aren't supported by research.’

More alarmingly, it said “Raw milk contains numerous pathogens, such as salmonella and E. coli 0157:H7, that cause significant food-borne illness and can lead to hospitalization, kidney failure and even death.” The food poising risks far outweigh the unsubstantiated purported benefits of raw milk in preventing eczema.

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/raw-milk/MY01293



#2 Type of Evidence


The type of evidence the website provides to support its eczema solutions are predominantly testimonial and and only uses 1 testimonial- her own.

She conveniently attributes her healing to a long list of approaches: homeopathy, natural raw food diet and juice, special pils and tea, uropathy, and herbal remedies. This allows her to market an entire range of products and increase her profit margin.

#3 Commercial interest

This brings me to my next point about Shirley’s real interests. It may be disappointing for some, but her topmost concern would probably not be in treating people’s ailments as it is in selling so-called natural, organic products to earn money. There is potential bias in the information provided as it would not be neutral and based on scientific fact but geared towards promoting its products.



#4 Credentials of information provider

Although doctors and studies are cited strategically throughout the website, the author herself is not a health professional with any kind of academic credentials but merely a layperson with certain health beliefs.

She openly admits it herself in the disclaimer of the website that she





Shirley's Disclaimer
# 5 The Secret Ingredient



The website recommends “life-giving, omega-3 rich oils” and describes an esoteric eating ritual of ingesting these oils straight. Healthy skin can be promoted by a healthy diet but this is an unnatural way to ingest nutrients and may even cause discomfort and nausea from swallowing these oils straight.

This is wrong mindset towards food as we have learnt that each food contains many nutrients and we cannot mentally attribute 1 specific nutrient label to a particular food (like tuna fish=protein). In fact, I learnt in an advertising class that marketers for pharmaceutical industries try to expand perceived needs for products by reinterpreting the wide range of properties in food stuffs and marketing each individual property to fulfill a particular ailment. 

Likewise this website seems to jazz up the whole institution of eating by stressing the miraculous benefits of certain components of food, (besides oil, it promotes Certified Organic Whole-Food Sea Vegetables and holy thistle tea) and this detracts from its credibility as it does not provide commonsensical advice.

An eczema sufferer is much better off taking a balanced diet which would provide all the nutrients than succumb to marketing hogwash and spend money on these products.

To give this website the slight benefit of doubt, I went to research on the purported benefits oil brings to healing eczema  and came to the National Institutes of Health’s National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCAM) website.

http://nccam.nih.gov/health/eveningprimrose
There is said that Evening primrose oil may have modest benefits for eczema, and it may be useful for rheumatoid arthritis and breast pain. However, study results are mixed, and most studies have been small and not well designed.

This site was much more trustworthy as well it showed that there was some truth in evening primrose oil, it included scientific findings on it, as well as sections on introduction, side effects and caution and sources.

#6 Fast-fixes for You J
Also notice the 14-day Cure-process item; which presupposes tht eczema is like a disease. According to the American Academy of Family Physicians, eczema and atopic dermatitis can’t be cured, but they can be managed, and one can learn to avoid the things that trigger them. 


Conclusion
Always be wary of unreliable websites boasting about miracle eczema cures. Only go to reputable websites for information or book an appointment with your general practitioner.

Some reputable websites

Monday 23 January 2012

1. Introducing Atopic Eczema


Hey there, my name is Vivien and I’m a university student who loves listening to music, learning new things, hanging out with family and friends, dancing, reading, shopping… the list goes on. In short, I believe in living life to the fullest.

And one more important fact- I have atopic eczema. It’s a skin condition of dry, sensitive skin that I’ve been dealing with for many years. It has affected my life greatly and at times stopped me from doing the things I wanted. But having this problem has taught me lessons in patience, faith and ‘social-savviness’ (fending well-meaning but unhelpful comments from others) as well.

I’ve set up this blog devoted to discussions about atopic eczema whose other names include infantile eczema, flexural eczema, atopic dermatitis. The target audience would be other people with the condition, their care-givers, and anyone else interested in knowing more about atopic eczema. According to some estimates, up to 17% of Canadians suffer from atopic eczema at some point in their lives, so it’s an issue worth addressing. [1]
Through this learning journey of 4 blogposts, I hope to get more educated about this skin disorder by seeing it through a scientific lens and develop information literacy skills in assessing ‘advice’ about eczema treatments out there.

No flu jab option is available to heal eczema instantaneously. This makes managing eczema frustrating as it improves only under consistent, religious skin care regimen. Other than physical discomfort, the patient and caregiver may encounter psychological stress.

My main message would be to develop strong mental health to accept the condition, manage it following sound scientifically-backed treatments and live life with a smile.

Helpful Links about Atopic Eczema

Canadian Dermatology Association http://www.eczemahelp.ca/index.html
The Eczema Society of Canada http://www.eczemahelp.ca/treatments.html
Personal Stories on Eczema  http://eczemahelp.ca/share.html

Moisturize daily, 
Vivien


 1 Eczema Prevalence in Canada. Ipsos-Insight Health, 2003